Enable Vivado's xsim to run on some simpler testcases for better compile-check coverage. #7
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,8 +1,12 @@
|
||||
import os
|
||||
|
||||
from parameterized import parameterized_class
|
||||
|
||||
from ..lib.sim_testcase import SimTestCase
|
||||
from ..lib.synth_testcase import SynthTestCase
|
||||
from ..lib.test_params import TEST_PARAMS
|
||||
from ..lib.simulators.xilinx import Xilinx
|
||||
import pytest
|
||||
|
||||
@parameterized_class(TEST_PARAMS)
|
||||
class Test(SimTestCase):
|
||||
@@ -13,3 +17,24 @@ class Test(SimTestCase):
|
||||
class TestSynth(SynthTestCase):
|
||||
def test_dut(self):
|
||||
self.run_synth()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.mark.skipif(os.environ.get("STUB_SIMULATOR", False), reason="user skipped")
|
||||
@parameterized_class(TEST_PARAMS)
|
||||
class TestVivado(SimTestCase):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Vivado XSIM's implementation of clocking blocks is broken, which is heavily used
|
||||
by the testbench infrastructure in most testcases.
|
||||
Since this group of tests does not rely on writing HWIF values, the bugs in
|
||||
xsim are avoided.
|
||||
|
||||
Run this testcase using xsim to get some cross-simulator coverage.
|
||||
Goal is to validate the generated RTL doesn't use constructs that offend xsim.
|
||||
|
||||
This is skipped in CI stub tests as it doesn't add value
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
simulator_cls = Xilinx
|
||||
|
||||
def test_dut(self):
|
||||
self.run_test()
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user