bslathi19/cc65
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions 1 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Changed multi-line C comments into another style.

Browse Source 
The left side doesn't look unbalanced.
This commit is contained in:
Greg King
2014-06-30 05:10:35 -04:00
parent 132d57f1ad
commit 0390c34e88
502 changed files with 8869 additions and 8884 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

24
src/da65/handler.c
View File

@@ -93,8 +93,8 @@ static void OneLine (const OpcDesc* D, const char* Arg, ...)
static const char* GetAbsOverride (unsigned Flags, unsigned Addr)
/* If the instruction requires an abs override modifier, return the necessary
* string, otherwise return the empty string.
*/
** string, otherwise return the empty string.
*/
{
if ((Flags & flAbsOverride) != 0 && Addr < 0x100) {
return "a:";
@@ -137,10 +137,10 @@ static void GenerateLabel (unsigned Flags, unsigned Addr)
((Flags & flUseLabel) != 0 && Addr >= CodeStart && Addr <= CodeEnd))) {
/* As a special case, handle ranges with tables or similar. Within
* such a range with a granularity > 1, do only generate dependent
* labels for all addresses but the first one. Be sure to generate
* a label for the start of the range, however.
*/
** such a range with a granularity > 1, do only generate dependent
** labels for all addresses but the first one. Be sure to generate
** a label for the start of the range, however.
*/
attr_t Style = GetStyleAttr (Addr);
unsigned Granularity = GetGranularity (Style);
@@ -153,8 +153,8 @@ static void GenerateLabel (unsigned Flags, unsigned Addr)
/* Search for the start of the range or the last non dependent
* label in the range.
*/
** label in the range.
*/
unsigned Offs;
attr_t LabelAttr;
unsigned LabelAddr = Addr;
@@ -414,10 +414,10 @@ void OH_BitBranch (const OpcDesc* D)
unsigned BranchAddr = (((int) PC+3) + BranchOffs) & 0xFFFF;
/* Generate labels in pass 1. The bit branch codes are special in that
* they don't really match the remainder of the 6502 instruction set (they
* are a Rockwell addon), so we must pass additional flags as direct
* value to the second GenerateLabel call.
*/
** they don't really match the remainder of the 6502 instruction set (they
** are a Rockwell addon), so we must pass additional flags as direct
** value to the second GenerateLabel call.
*/
GenerateLabel (D->Flags, TestAddr);
GenerateLabel (flLabel, BranchAddr);