diff --git a/test/val/bug1462-biefield-assign-4.c b/test/val/bug1462-biefield-assign-4.c
index f811ddbd6..e607dbd25 100644
--- a/test/val/bug1462-biefield-assign-4.c
+++ b/test/val/bug1462-biefield-assign-4.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 
 /* issue #1462 - Bit-fields are still broken */
-/* More tests on "op= expression result value" that a naive fix might fail with */
+/* When (un-)signedness involves with integral promotion */
 
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include <limits.h>
diff --git a/test/val/bug1838.c b/test/val/bug1838.c
index 45978dca4..38becf5e9 100644
--- a/test/val/bug1838.c
+++ b/test/val/bug1838.c
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
 /* Bug 1838 - function parameters declared as function types rather than function pointers */
 
 #include <stdio.h>
- 
+
 static int failures = 0;
 
 typedef int fn_t(int);
- 
+
 int main(void)
 {
     void foo(fn_t*);
diff --git a/test/val/bug1847-struct-field-access.c b/test/val/bug1847-struct-field-access.c
index 55ead7ec7..f7e19e40b 100644
--- a/test/val/bug1847-struct-field-access.c
+++ b/test/val/bug1847-struct-field-access.c
@@ -41,6 +41,6 @@ int main(void) {
     if (failures > 0) {
         printf("Failures: %u\n", failures);
     }
-    
+
     return failures;
 }